(...)
On Tuesday, Ashton visit Egypt. Be the first (1) does diplomatic representative in the post-Mubarak. The reaction and reception that will provide the institutions and the Egyptian society will be a good indication of the image and perception is now the Union abroad. As noted in repeated occasions on this blog * * * * * , have reason to believe that the role of Europe in recent months may be perceived as 'hypocritical', 'interested' and 'accomplice'. Visit Egypt so quickly is not without risks. Maybe even be considered a 'reckless' diplomatic, and regardless of whether it goes well or goes wrong, can have a symbolic and media at the regional level. Ashton will be the with a population in a state of shock, especially "sensitive" after a rise of liberation and national pride.
On his return, Ashton has been scheduled for Wednesday, an international conference in Brussels (to be attended by diplomats from the United States, North Africa, Japan and financial institutions) to agree a joint strategy in the face of changes to take in the region.
Things seem to move. Pending seen to stop.
Update 1: Ashton will not be the 'first' representative to visit Egypt. It has been 24 hours in advance Cameron who wish to visit the Mediterranean country 'surprise' on Monday. The first British visit, just the day the foreign ministers were meeting with the High Representative for 'coordinating' a common response at EU level is at least 'amazing'. Short wild, totally unjustified and very open to criticism by the English, and good indication of the lack of care with which the UK sees the work of fellow and head of Foreign Affairs of the Union.
Update 1: Ashton will not be the 'first' representative to visit Egypt. It has been 24 hours in advance Cameron who wish to visit the Mediterranean country 'surprise' on Monday. The first British visit, just the day the foreign ministers were meeting with the High Representative for 'coordinating' a common response at EU level is at least 'amazing'. Short wild, totally unjustified and very open to criticism by the English, and good indication of the lack of care with which the UK sees the work of fellow and head of Foreign Affairs of the Union.
0 comments:
Post a Comment