The other side of the communication is made by the Parliament as a public institution . There is a need to break the prejudices in relation to an alleged 'line' editorial untouchable Parliament, central and unique . In the institutional triangle Parliament is the institution with more 'hip game' against the interests of Member States, and more with the Lisbon Treaty (though is the current bogeyman moms to mourn the poor children). The specifcity and possibilities of Parliament should be synonymous with boldness and greater freedom of action compared with the Commission or Council (as they already do many of the MEPs politically on issues like the budget or the policy of access to premises for officers of a body to another).
The voice of the European Parliament are mainly MEPs, as well Barbara insisted in his presentation. They are the main 'Internet' and 'users' to be promoted and pushed to join the network by institutional managers PE communication. However
not be the only ones. There platforms 'connect' with the citizens, which are collective and maintaining the character 'institutional' -without impersonal. As Writing for (y) EU or Talking about the EU. Increasingly the spokespersons of the Directors General of the Commission are in a twitter, blogs have increasingly ... vice president of political parties based part of his work in the field online. Parliament must find a way to 'expand' all these inner voices legitimate and PE-including his own by EuroparlTV, EUTube ...
Working with targets, with regular monitoring and having clear objectives. The European Parliament must continue providing itself as it is doing the 'expertise' needed to be aware of the 'state' and the evolution of digital debate on Europe. The European Parliament's ability to reach citizens and penetrate the network society is foremost in their own hands .
 |
| The Good (and only) | Cuttlas
0 comments:
Post a Comment